Friday, April 27, 2012

Tell Council YOU DEMAND a Plebiscite



The following quotes are from the Chronicle Journal Editorial
Friday April 27/2012

"the power brokers must always bear in mind who’s in charge. Grand plans cost money and it mostly comes from taxpayers."

"Presumably, the consultants will have an answer for this. They always do, but there’s no way to hold them to account if they’re wrong."
"Hobbs thinks the fix is in among consultants and city administrators to arrange that in order to assure the waterfront district gets the multiplex"

(Mayor Hobbs has stated the CJ editorial was inaccurate, and he made no such statement)
http://www.chroniclejournal.com/editorial/daily_editorial/2012-04-27/follow-development

It is important the city gets this right,we'll be spending around $150 - 200 million. The people should decide, not council! If you agree, send council a message that


Sunday, April 22, 2012

Where is Innova Park?

Innova Park from the TB Expressway

Innova Park at the corner of Central Ave & Innovation Drive


Multiplex location @ corner of Capitol Way & Innovation Drive

Innova Park is Centrally located in Thunder Bay,near Thunder Bay Regional, Lakehead University, and Confederation College at the corner of the Harbour Expressway and the Expressway. It is surrounded by the Thunder Bay Expressway ,Harbour Expressway,Golf Links Road and Oliver Road. Entrances are located on Oliver Road,Golf Links Road (2), and Harbour Expressway. Golf Links Rd is in the city plans for four laning & lights at Central Ave.

http://www.thunderbay.ca/City_Government/News_and_Strategic_Initiatives/Renew_Thunder_Bay/Golf_Links_Rd_Junot_Ave_Improvement_Project.htm

South Entrance on Golf Links Road

Central Ave Entrance on Golf Links Road
(traffic signals are slated to be installed here)


Oliver Road Entrance onto Burwood Drive

Harbour Expressway Entrance

All Roads Lead To Innova Park

Right click to open in new window
Innova Park is surrouned on all four sides by four lanes roads. The TB Expressway, Harbor Expressway, Oliver Road are already four laned, with Golf Links Rd. is to be four laned from Harbor Expressway, to Red River Rd. A traffic signal is also to be added to the Golf Links/ Central Ave intersection.
 Innova Parks central location is Superior in serving Thunder Bay equitably. Comparable distances are,

Innova Park
South to Loch Lomond Road 11 minutes
North to Hodder Ave/Arundel 13 minutes

SE to East End Bridge 7 minutes
NW to County Fair 8 minutes

S to Frederica St 8 minutes
N to PA Clinic  9 minutes

How Sensible is Water St, Innova Park Trumps it!

Supporters of Water St as a location of a new multiplex have prepared a handout on why they believe it is the best location. I have responded to all their points, to refute the reasons they give, and why Innova Park is the Superior location! This is their handout, as of April 21/2012.

___________________________________________________

Downtown Waterfront Multiplex

Economic   
                 Between Greenfield/downtown sites, the downtown sites did significantly better for economic reasons because they had the 'Critical Mass'

                 Innova Park is in an early stage of developing. Private development in the area is  expanding south to Innova Park. Recent developments include, Days Inn (in second expansion), mini mall with 5 Forks restaurant @ Oliver Rd/Golf Links Rd. ,chiropractic clinic, grocery store ,pet food store.  Thunder Bay Country Club is commencing a major condominium project.

                 Based on the consultant's comments the Downtown site would have “Medium-Good” economic spin off from the beginning where as the Innova site would have almost none till the long term (5-10 years).

                 The “Economic Benefit” realized by this facility being built at Innova Park, would be for the whole city, not just “downtown” businesses. With the placing of the facility in Innova Park, it would trigger the development of Innova Park benefitting the city finances two fold. When the lots are sold, the “City of Thunder Bay” recovers its investment in Innova Park, and receives property taxes on the sold properties. The sale of lots helps to offset the cost of building, and the property taxes will help to offset operating costs of the facility. This is of great benefit to all residents of Thunder Bay with helping to keep tax increases to a minimum. There is no comparable  benefit from the Water Street location.

                 The downtown site would support local bars, restaurants, shops that are already set up and paying taxes.

                 All businesses in Thunder Bay pay taxes, there have already been tens of millions of taxpayer dollars  spent in the former downtown PA. The Ontario Govt Building, The Casino, Marina Park . HOW MUCH MORE ARE TAXPAYERS EXPECTED TO SPEND FOR THE BENEFIT OF THE DOWNTOWN MERCHANTS? The perception this facility will make the former downtown PA a vibrant locale, is debatable, downtown FW has deteriorated  greatly, even with FW Gardens bringing people downtown.

History
                 Based on the consultants comments “A majority of new arenas were being built in downtown and a majority of successful ones were downtown”

                 Thunder Bay is unique, different from most other cities, it was two cities to be joined as one. To suggest that either of the two former downtowns is presently “Downtown” is a great misrepresentation. The Oliver Road/CLE Fairgrounds truly represents Thunder Bay’s “Downtown”.

                 Of the 3 brownfield sites in Ontario, none were able to provide an economic stimulus to the area where as the downtown sites ranged from small-great

                 Several downtown  arenas named by the consultants, are suffering financially. The support of the hockey crowd is of great  importance to the success of an arena. The overwhelming choice of Thunder Bay hockey supporters is Innova Park.



-        The John Labatt center in downtown London revitalized the downtown and is making money year after year.

                 London Ontario draws from a much larger and denser surrounding population, then Thunder Bay. Their OHL team can draw competing teams fans, who are located a couple hours away.

Cost
                 The downtown site was originally expected to be around 80 million dollars, the lowest of the 6 original sites

                 The cost of the proposed facility has already escalated in cost  to the most recent figure of $100 million. The Innova Park price could not have increased by this amount with no changes having been made. The original cost figure given for Innova Park included the cost of a parking lot, no parking facilities were included in the Water St figures, thus the perceived lower cost. Since the original cost was given, a  parkade costing $16 million has been added to Water St, thus  making Innova Park the least expensive of the two sites.

                 The Innova arena would be built on land worth 2 million dollars. The downtown site is only $750,000.
                 With the cost of soil remediation on the site of hydro sub-station tagged at $3.5 million, the Water St. site is not $750,000 but, $4.25 million! Quite a difference in cost!

                 Interesting that they value the Innova property at $2million, this is the asking price for the site,not what the city spent on developing the site. Also,why is land for the waterfront condo project only (fair market value) valued at $690,067.50, after the amount spent by the city preparing the site, and the Innova Park $2 million? Does something sound strange here?

                 While the underground parking is expected to be $13 million, it doesn't need to be cleared of snow and can provide easy access for box owners, disabled, elderly and pregnant mothers. The Innova site would need 8 million spent on a parking lot which would need to be cleared of snow and monitored by police (new search area)

                 The cost of an announced parkade figure given was $16 million, underground parking for $13 million, either bring the cost higher than Innova Park.   Additional snow removal will still be required at Water St, a winter storm during an event would create hazardous situations for both motorists and pedestrians. New tax revenue from Innova Park can help offset any extra snow removal costs.

                 The downtown site doesn't need any upgrade work to the road system, where as Innova needs to be 4 laned and a set of lights would be added to the expressway to alleviate traffic (If MTO approves)

                 Golf Links Road has already been designated to be widened to four lanes, with a new traffic signal at the Golf Links/Central Ave. Intersection. This would have Innova Park surrounded by four lane roads on all four sides.
Parking/Traffic
                 The downtown site would have 400 less cars at the games and 8% more people would ride transit
                 Water St is to hold 5700 fans, at 4 per vehicle, 1425 spots would be needed. With a total of around 900 available spots, where would the other 500 plus park? Transit travels down Golf Links road already, transit routes are updated as required to accommodate new stops, as was done with TB Regional. Lots of bike paths presently exist in the neighboring Lakehead University and Confederation College area. Both Lakehead and Confederation are within walking distance of Innova Park. It is quite likely there would be increased support for LU Thunderwolves, who are likely tenants for a new facility.

                 The longest walk someone would have in the downtown site is 12 minutes, where as the Innova site is 9. Difference is that downtown you have stores and resturaunts and Innova is a parking lot.

                 There are several restaurants in the Intercity area within a five minute drive from Innova Park. Such restaurants include, The Keg, Applebee’s, and Montana’s. The majority of the cities better hotels are located 5-10 minutes from Innova Park, including Valhalla Inn, Travelodge, Victoria Inn, as well as a new Hampton Inn, and Marriott. Other supporting facilities include Lakehead University, Confederation College. These hotels and supporting facilities are of significant importance when hosting conventions, trade shows, etc.

                 It would take around 10-15 minutes to get from the building and out the parking lot in Innova, its about the same in the downtown except your leaving from a larger number of streets.

                 The walk from the front door is actually less than five minutes on flat terrain, to the furthest point in the parking lot!  This walk will be easier on patrons of all age groups, 50 % of Thunder Bay’s  population is over 50 years of age. Water St to the parkades are uphill, which will likely exclude many patrons.  Why  are such facts being misrepresented?

Vision
                 The city designated the downtown north core as the 'entertainment district” and to quote the consultant “Arenas that are built on there own tend to not do so well, its better when they are a part of something bigger”

                 These designations seem to be “designations of convenience”. The former FW downtown was designated as “Government”, if so why is the Ontario Government build in downtown PA?

                 With the huge amount of money put into Marina park it would be good to continue to additions
         
                 After tens of millions of taxpayer dollars have been spent in downtown PA, it  has failed to spur  new private sector developments, to generate new tax revenues for Thunder Bay. Has that previous spending created a good “return on investment”? Absolutely not! The Water St location of a new multiplex, is very "restricting" , and "limiting" in providing  options for any type of future expansion or growth! This is a "defining project" for Thunder Bay, that can either unite us or divide us. We need to answer the question, "Are we “one city”, Thunder Bay? , or is the legacy left from this project one that keeps us divided for the lifetime of the facility!

" Great developers never,limit their options,nor restrict their ability to grow" Donald Trump


 

Thursday, April 19, 2012

Innova Park,Offers The Only Real Economic Benefit for The City

The talk of the proposed multiplex,and its "economic impact" is quite debatable. The claim that it would increase economic activity in downtown PA if built on Water St is open to scrutiny,when downtown FW has declined,even with FW Gardens bringing people downtown for 60 years,so is that claimed impact a certainty? Increased "economic activity" in downtown is of benefit primarily to the businesses located there,not the whole city,and could be interpreted as a subsidy by some. Innova Park offers,the  great potential for real economic benefit for the city. There has been more private sector  development around Innova Park, generating new revenue for the city,than some realize. The River Terrace housing development is rapidly encroaching on Thunder Bay Regional,the Days Inn on Golf Links Rd is doing its second expansion ,there is a new mini mall at the corner of Oliver Rd, a new pet food store, a new chiropractic clinic, a new grocery store, and the development of a new condo project at Thunder Bay Country Club. This development is moving south to Innova Park. Built in the 1990's, it has been largely vacant, though that could turn out to be a major windfall economically for the city. With the boost of a new multiplex located in Innova Park, it would likely be the impetus needed for Innova Park to flourish, generating new revenue for the city. Innova Park is on property owned by the city, and the benefit economically will be two fold. When lots are sold in Innova Park,the city will be recovering its investment in Innova Park, and the property will generate new property tax revenue for the city. These new revenues for the city will partially offset building costs, and ease the expected operating expense on the new multiplex. Innova Park is the only location in Thunder Bay with these real economic benefits! This should be the "economic benefit" we seek out in the development of major public sector developments.

Wednesday, April 18, 2012

Innova Park Multiplex Preview














Multiplex Online Open House, Multiplex Facebook Page & other Info


City of Thunder Bay Multiplex Webpages
http://www.thunderbay.ca/City_Government/News_and_Strategic_Initiatives/Event_Centre.htm
http://www.facebook.com/ThunderBayEventCentre

Citizens For An Innova Park Multiplex
http://www.facebook.com/ThunderBayEventCentre#!/groups/423840314308798/

Mayor Hobbs said...



“We have to build a Thunder Bay Multiplex. Not a Fort William or a Port Arthur multiplex.”

Mayor Keith Hobbs,  CJ June 3/2011


“The public has to make this decision not council,not the Mayor" "We're going to take advice from the public on this one."

Mayor Keith Hobbs, TBT Newswatch June 2/2011

Whose interests is City Council representing?
If they aren't yours, email Mayor Hobbs and City Council and let them know you want them to represent you! Let them know you'd like your say in a plebiscite,which could be held next election.

Council
 afoulds@thunderbay.ca, tgiertuga@thunderbay.ca, ppugh@thunderbay.ca, lrydholm@thunderbay.ca, mbentz@thunderbay.ca, bmckinnon@thunderbay.ca, jvirdiramo@thunderbay.ca, kboshcoff@thunderbay.ca, iangus@thunderbay.ca, rjohnson@thunderbay.ca, lhebert@thunderbay.ca, aruberto@thunderbay.ca

City Manager
tcommisso@thunderbay.ca

Tuesday, April 17, 2012

The Choice of the people is Clearly Innova Park

The 2011 Chronicle Journal poll shows the choice of the proposed multiplex is clearly Innova Park. 2122 people voted in the poll,and 60% (1273)want Innova Park,more than double that of the Water Street site 29% (613). A previous poll with other choices had Innova Park 35% with Water Street 26%. At the open houses, Innova was the clear choice as well,though the choice was more divided on the north side. The reasons for Innova Park far out number any reasons for Water Street as the reasons against Water Street out number any reasons for it. The people have spoken,and are speaking. If Thunder Bay is truly a democracy and our council truly represent the will of the people,then Innova Park is the location of a new multiplex. Any decision to build elsewhere by council would be a betrayal of our democratic system, and gross misrepresentation.
Where does the city & council think the support is for the Water Street location? Check the poll results from these CJ poll's .
http://www.chroniclejournal.com/editorial/poll/2011-06-27
http://www.chroniclejournal.com/editorial/poll/2011-05-10

Thunder Bay,More one city in 1921,than in 2012

The placing of a new multiplex on Water St in the former downtown PA,rather than in the more equitably accessible (to all of the city) Innova Park location, will prevent Thunder Bay from growing into a city of one,and perpetuate the "tale of two cities" identity that has existed,and continues to exist. As a city of one, decision's made in the 1920's were to the benefit of both communities having relatively equal access. A July 8 1921 article in the Daily Times Journal tells of, making the "Agricultural Grounds" (CLE) a "central sporting center" for both cities. The voting on such a proposal, was unanimous, among the voters at the meeting. Attending were representitives of,the agricultural society, Twin City Drivers Assn,Twin Port Motor Club, & FW Public works. While the race track was a big part of the designation,it was also including numerous other sporting/recreational activities throughout the year, which occurred at the agricultural grounds. What makes this choice,and co-operation even more remarkable is that in 1920,a plebiscite on amalgamation was declined. So, 90 years prior to amalgamation, the twin cities thought the idea of "centralization" for benefit of both cities made good sense. Now here we are, forty plus years after amalgamation, and the thought of "centralization" of a multiplex to serve the whole city seems like a bad idea to certain councillors and media in Thunder Bay! I'm sure some will call this progress.

Innova Park vs Downtown

June 27/2011


The (Mon June 27) editorial is the second in which the CJ has expressed support of the Water St Bus terminal location for a new multiplex. The reason’s against that location far out way any reason’s favouring it. Clearly it is the poorest location of the three identified, with the Arthur St/Airport site being the second worst. With certain member’s of city council seeming to have a “Pro Port Arthur” bias, I’m very concerned the location chosen will be yet another disaster for our city that future generation’s will have to endure. Claim’s of downtown PA being the “Entertainment District” are without merit, are completely ridiculous, and are the reasons(s) of someone without a sound argument. In 1970 the venue’s in downtown PA were the Odeon & Paramount theatre’s, the largest entertainment venue, FW Garden’s, along with the Odeon & Capitol theatre’s were in the south end, does that “Designation” really make any sense? Foolish argument’s like this are myopic and regressive in the advancement and growth of our city and will only perpetuate the divide our city (cities) still suffer's from forty year’s after amalgamation. Thunder Bay need’s a central identity to meld into a true city, and the continuing failed attempt’s to revive the former downtown core’s defeat’s this totally. The downtown core’s are dead! While there are some good shops in both, they will never be even a shadow of their past existence. Private money has built the Oliver Road/CLE Fairgrounds corridor as our “new downtown”, so its time to quit flogging a dead horse! Victoriaville was to revive downtown FW, did it? (nor will the waste of money courthouse), that should be behind the police station on Rheaume St. The Ontario Govt building, the casino (with no more entertainment value than any bowling alley) and the Marina were all suppose to pump up downtown PA and all have been minimally successful negating any benefit for its cost. After the countless tax dollar’s spent, there has yet to be any uttering of any major private investment in either core, so much for “revitalization“. With “nothing” built at Innova Park, there has been land purchased for a truck stop and for a proposed shopping complex, though I’m uncertain of the status of these project’s, it's more than in either core. Clearly spending more public tax dollar’s on either downtown core is equivalent to buying a ticket on a sinking ship, No thanks ! Some say “we need to support our local businesses”, the forgotten business is the future tenant(s) of the facility. There are people in each end of the city who will not travel to the other end for entertainment and doesn’t it make more sense to maximize the opportunity for these tenants to succeed when the facility depend’s on their success? FW Garden’s became the primary venue in Thunder Bay by default, it was planned to serve Fort William, not Thunder Bay. Had the two cities pooled their resources to build a facility at that time I have no doubt its location would not be in either downtown, but centrally located to serve both sides, should that be any different now? Its time to get out of denial, face reality in this city and exercise common sense. We must build public projects centrally to serve the whole city equitably, and to create a unifying identity. Simpson Sears built in Intercity in the late 1950’s and have never built another location, because they got it right the first time exercising great foresight. Walmart is the worlds largest retailer and does extensive research for their location, they're centrally located and not in either core, get the picture? Reason’s favouring the centrally located Innova Park far out way any reasons favouring the other sites combined! Let’s get it right this time, build it for the whole city, not the core you grew up or live in!

Why Innova Park is the Perfect Location

June 8/2011
In a January 2010 survey by the CJ, a choice of locations for a new multiplex had the favoured site as the Pool 6/Marina Park site over FW Gardens and the tournament center on Hwy 61. In a January 16/2010 letter I suggested that Innova Park would be a “perfect location“, and had been overlooked in the survey. Almost a year and half later the favoured sites according to the most recent CJ survey (June 2/2011), are Innova Park 35 % and Downtown PA (Water street bus depot site) 26 % . I believe the advantages of building at Innova Park and the several disadvantages of the downtown site make Innova Park the best, if not the only choice. These are the reason’s I believe Innova Park should be the location of a new multiplex.
Most importantly, Innova Park is centrally located, which enables all area’s of the city the most equitable access to the multiplex, which all city taxpayers will be paying for. Downtown PA (Water Street) is not, and does not equitably serve the whole city. As Mayor Keith Hobbs said in the CJ June 3/2011, “we have to build a Thunder Bay Multiplex. Not a Fort William or a Port Arthur multiplex.” Only Innova Park serves the city as a whole.
Innova Park has excellent entrance and egress, with lots of room for parking available. With new entrance/exits added on Golf Links Road and Harbour Expressway, with the upcoming four laning of Golf Links with new traffic lights at Central Ave, exiting Innova Park will be extremely efficient. Downtown PA is already short on parking, primarily offering the Red River Road and Court Street parkade’s, exiting will very likely be very inefficient and lengthy. Developing underground parking at the facility would increase its cost to above that of Innova Park.
Downtown supporters also say there are no restaurant’s at Innova Park (at the present time). Within a five minute drive there are five restaurants, three of which are quite popular.
Innova Park offers great opportunity for future expansion, facility flexibility and future development. With the pending Flying J truck stop and property having been purchased for retail development (though I am uncertain of the status of these projects), new development will bring new tax revenue to the city. There is minimal opportunity for expansion in Downtown PA for new development. With the elimination of the Water street transit depot, a new one will need to be constructed at an additional cost. Constructing one in conjunction with the facility will, limit the multiplex size as well as increase its cost. Facility size is completely flexible at Innova Park. In his letter May 17/2011, Cliff Lundberg suggests possibly modelling the multiplex after the Powerade Center in Brampton with all parking within 100 meters of the facility. It also includes extra ice surfaces that would provide extra floor space for trade show’s and keep the facility active. This can only be done at Innova Park.Innova Park has excellent access to the airport, highways, and hotels for out of town guests. City Manager Tim Commisso has said comparative venues in other cities, that the facility was used 60 % for conventions, so access to hotels is important. There are ten (with another one coming) hotels within a five/ten minute drive of Innova Park, three which offer banquet/meeting facilities. There are two older hotels located in Downtown PA, only one offering banquet/meeting facilities. Former Sales Director at the Valhalla Inn Nancy Oster, states in her letter May 14/2011 that such a facility requires “an adequate number of hotel room’s in close proximity to house these participants”. Clearly Innova Park fits this need far more effectively than Downtown PA.
Innova Park is basically next door to Lakehead University which also offers convention facilities. LU makes good use of the FW Gardens presently and likely would make equal or greater use of the facility being “next door”, and would make access easier to support their team.
Supporters of Downtown PA say we need to support the local businesses, the business that seem’s to be getting forgotten is the tenant(s) of the proposed facility. There is no doubt that some on the PA side will not travel to FW Gardens because of its location, I’m certain some on the FW side will not travel to the Downtown PA site for the same reason. Would it not be wise to maximize the full city exposure to a tenant at the multiplex whose success and survival is of primary importance to the facility?
What has to be the most ridiculous argument in support of Downtown PA, is its designation as the “Entertainment District”. This designation was clearly flawed from the beginning. At the time of amalgamation in 1970, there were two entertainment venues there, the Odeon and Paramount theatres, with the city’s major entertainment venue Fort William Gardens located in the other end of town (does that designation make sense?). If this designation is so significant, why was the Cineplex built at the CLE grounds with both those theatres now closed? Claims that the Downtown PA location will “revitalize the downtown care I view with scepticism, FW Gardens has been downtown for 60 years, bringing people “downtown” , ever been in Downtown FW lately, hardly the symbol of vitality! In conversation it was expressed to me, “how many times do we need to attempt revitalizing downtown, first the Ontario Govt Building ( shouldn’t that have been in the south core “Government district?), the casino, Marina Park.
We’ll only get one chance to do this right, in business “location, location, location” is the number one rule, Simpson Sears built in Intercity during the late 1950’s, and have never built a second location because they got it right the first time! Lets follow the foresight Simpson Sears had over fifty years ago and serve the whole city equitably. For these reasons I feel Innova Park is still, the “Perfect location” for a new “Thunder Bay Multiplex”, and will be for decades to come!

Build the Multiplex at Innova Park

Sat Jan 16 2010
In your recent online survey asking where a new multiplex facility should be built, I feel the perfect location has been overlooked.
The marina is a very poor location due to limited entrance and egress. At present, one would need to weave through the park to use the Howe Street overpass, or be at the mercy of the traffic light at Pearl Street, or perhaps have to wait for a train to pass before leaving the park is possible.
Neither the marina or Tournament Centre locations are centrally located, nor is the Fort William Gardens which has limited parking.
While it would be nice to look at the Nor'Westers or Lake Superior (which is frozen in winter), you do go inside the facility, not sit outside looking at the scenery.
The best location in my opinion would be at Innova Business Park. Consider that the city owns the land, it is centrally located, close to LU and the hospital, and would have excellent entrance and exit.
Exiting onto Golf Links Road, one could go east or west on the Harbour Expressway turning north or south onto the Thunder Bay Expressway. Land there has been sold with the intent of building a shopping complex. A multipurpose facility with twin surfaces for trade show floor space, adjoining a hotel/convention complex at Innova Park would be an excellent addition to Thunder Bay. The hotel/convention centre could bring money to our city and people with money to invest here as well.
Such a facility could also attract private investment, either fully or partially, perhaps in conjunction with a major hotel chain. Close access to the airport and highways are important for such a complex and I believe the Innova Park location would have the best chance to attract such a chain.